United States v. Stewart

337 F.3d 103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 337 F.3d 103
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 14, 2003·No. 02-1938·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 02-1938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOHN B. STEWART,

Defendant, Appellant.

Before

Lynch, Circuit Judge, Coffin and Porfilio,1 Senior Circuit Judges.

ERRATA

The opinion of the court issued on July 29,2003, is amended as follows:

On page 8, line 7: delete "has the obligation" and substitute "should"

On page 8, line 8: delete "to"

On page 8, line 14: insert the following footnote after "cause."

Although we urge full disclosure of all non-trivial information available to law enforcement, this does not alter the longstanding materiality test for a Franks hearing. An evidentiary hearing is required only if the defendant is able to show that alleged misstatements or omissions are material to the probable cause determination.

1 Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, 337 F.3d 103 (1st Cir. 2003).

337 F.3d 103 (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.