United States v. Stevenson

19 C.M.A. 69, 19 USCMA 69, 41 C.M.R. 69, 1969 CMA LEXIS 642, 1969 WL 6285
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 1969
DocketNo. 22,288
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 C.M.A. 69 (United States v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stevenson, 19 C.M.A. 69, 19 USCMA 69, 41 C.M.R. 69, 1969 CMA LEXIS 642, 1969 WL 6285 (cma 1969).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted by general court-martial, convened in the Federal Republic of Germany, of the unpremeditated murder of a Canadian soldier. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for thirty years. Intermediate appellate; authorities affirmed the findings and' sentence without change. We granted review to determine the validity of the accused’s conviction in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969).

[70]*70Authority for trial by court-martial in the Federal Republic of Germany is contained in the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. In the case at bar, jurisdiction over the offense was released to the American military authorities by the German prosecutor at Arnsberg, Germany (Appellate Exhibit 12).

In United States v Keaton, 19 USCMA 64, 41 CMR 64, we held that all offenses coming within the purview of the Uniform Code of Military Justice committed in a foreign country were triable by court-martial in that country. See also United States v Easter, 19 USCMA 68, 41 CMR 68. For the reasons stated in those opinions, equally applicable here, the constitutional limitations on court-martial jurisdiction referred to in O’Callahan v Parker, supra, do not: deprive a court-martial of jurisdiction when trial is held in a foreign, country.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs. Judge Darden concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert G. Gallagher v. The United States
423 F.2d 1371 (Court of Claims, 1970)
United States v. Blackwell
19 C.M.A. 196 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Bryan
19 C.M.A. 184 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Gill
19 C.M.A. 93 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)
United States v. Higginbotham
19 C.M.A. 73 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 C.M.A. 69, 19 USCMA 69, 41 C.M.R. 69, 1969 CMA LEXIS 642, 1969 WL 6285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stevenson-cma-1969.