United States v. Stevenson

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Stevenson

79 F.2d 788, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 4, 1935·No. No. 7591·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The pertinent facts in this appeal are ■similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.

For the reasons given in _the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The pertinent facts in this appeal are ■similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.

For the reasons given in _the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.

United States v. Stevenson, 79 F.2d 788, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267 (9th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

79 F.2d 788 (United States v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related