United States v. Stevenson

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Stevenson

79 F.2d 788, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1935

DocketNo. 7591

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 79 F.2d 788 (United States v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stevenson, 79 F.2d 788, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267 (9th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The pertinent facts in this appeal are ■similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.

For the reasons given in _the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The pertinent facts in this appeal are ■similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.

For the reasons given in _the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 F.2d 788, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stevenson-ca9-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack