United States v. Stevens

144 F. App'x 564
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2005
DocketNo. 04-4339
StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 564 (United States v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stevens, 144 F. App'x 564 (7th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

Keith Stevens pleaded guilty to Count 6 of a nine-count superceding indictment, which charged him with distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Relying on a career-offender recommendation and other guidelines-based findings, the district court sentenced Stevens as a career offender to 151 months’ imprisonment, the low-end of the applicable guideline range. Stevens now argues under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), that the district court improperly treated the sentencing guidelines as mandatory and that this court should remand the case for resentencing. See United States v. Schlifer, 403 F.3d 849, 854 (7th Cir.2005). The government concedes that Stevens preserved his Booker objection and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. Accordingly, we VACATE Stevens’s sentence and REMAND for full resentencing in light of Booker. See United States v. Goldberg, 406 F.3d 891, 894-95 (7th Cir. 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. James T. Schlifer
403 F.3d 849 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Jeffrey L. Goldberg
406 F.3d 891 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. App'x 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stevens-ca7-2005.