United States v. Stevens

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 1999·No. 98-7728·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DELTON SCOTT STEVENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-310, CA-94-3380-6)

Submitted: July 30, 1999 Decided: August 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Delton Scott Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Delton Scott Stevens seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Stevens, Nos. CR-90-310;

CA-94-3380-6 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stevens, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Stevens (United States v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related