United States v. Steven Royce Larson

62 F. App'x 129
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2003
Docket02-3758
StatusUnpublished

This text of 62 F. App'x 129 (United States v. Steven Royce Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Steven Royce Larson, 62 F. App'x 129 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Royce Larson (Larson) appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after Larson pled guilty to possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). At sentencing, the district court denied Larson an acceptanee-of-responsibility reduction because of his participation in a drug transaction the day after he entered his guilty plea.

Larson argues the district court erred in denying the reduction because his post-plea conduct was an attempt to gain valuable information for the government. After careful review of the record, we find that the district court did not clearly err in denying the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, cmt. nn.l(b), 3; United States v. Ervasti 201 F.3d 1029, 1043 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review); United States v. Nguyen, 52 F.3d 192, 194 (8th Cir.1995).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 F. App'x 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steven-royce-larson-ca8-2003.