United States v. Steven Robinson
This text of 616 F. App'x 219 (United States v. Steven Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Steven Robinson appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence that the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a federal bank robbery charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and in a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel challenges the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 672 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc) (abuse-of-discretion review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir.2014). Further, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfriv-olous issues.
The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steven-robinson-ca8-2015.