United States v. Steven Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2020·No. 20-6898·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6898

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN SAKASKI ROBINSON, a/k/a Worm,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Sakaski Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Sakaski Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

a reduction of his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,

§ 404, 32 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Robinson, No. 4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1 (D.S.C. June 2, 2020). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Steven Robinson, (4th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Steven Robinson (United States v. Steven Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.