United States v. Steven Krpata

395 F. App'x 648
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Steven Krpata. Read the opinion of the Court — 388 F. App'x 886
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 14, 2010·No. 10-11322·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, Assistant Federal Public Defender and appellate counsel for Steven Krpata in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Krpata’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Steven Krpata, 395 F. App'x 648 (11th Cir. 2010).

395 F. App'x 648 (United States v. Steven Krpata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)