United States v. Steven Cooper

107 F.3d 868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Steven Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F.3d 1127
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 1997·No. 20-4270·Unpublished

Opinion

107 F.3d 868

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Steven COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-7541.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
Decided Feb. 27, 1997.

Steven Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cooper, Nos. CR-93-414-A; CA-96-1151-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Steven Cooper, 107 F.3d 868 (4th Cir. 1997).

107 F.3d 868 (United States v. Steven Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related