United States v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers

941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23869
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 1991
Docket91-7579
StatusUnpublished

This text of 941 F.2d 1208 (United States v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers, United States of America v. Steven A. Silvers, 941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23869 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

941 F.2d 1208

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STEVEN A. SILVERS, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STEVEN A. SILVERS, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STEVEN A. SILVERS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-7579, 91-7589, 91-7607.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOURTH CIRCUIT

Submitted: July 18, 1991
Decided: August 23, 1991

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Steven A. Silvers, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Steven A. Silvers appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion for correction of an illegal sentence and related motion for reconsideration, his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence, and his motion for discovery of certain allegedly exculpatory materials and related motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's orders denying relief reveals that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, the orders of the district court are affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mundy (Antoine Marvin)
941 F.2d 1208 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 F.2d 1208, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steven-a-silvers-united-states-of-america-v-steven-a-ca4-1991.