United States v. Steve Rudolph Gelis

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Steve Rudolph Gelis

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20856, 1994 WL 259256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1994

Docket92-6513

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1041 (United States v. Steve Rudolph Gelis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Steve Rudolph Gelis, 25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20856, 1994 WL 259256 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Steve Rudolph GELIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 92-6513.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 1993.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-56, CA-92-295).

Steven Rudolph Gelis, Appellant Pro Se.

Solomon Louis Wisenberg, Ass't. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Rudolph Gelis appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Gelis, Nos. CR-88-56; CA-92-295 (E.D.N.C. May 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Gelis's motions for oral argument, appointment of counsel, and production of transcripts

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Steve Rudolph GELIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 92-6513.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 1993.
Decided June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-56, CA-92-295).

Steven Rudolph Gelis, Appellant Pro Se.

Solomon Louis Wisenberg, Ass't. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Rudolph Gelis appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Gelis, Nos. CR-88-56; CA-92-295 (E.D.N.C. May 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Gelis's motions for oral argument, appointment of counsel, and production of transcripts

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20856, 1994 WL 259256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steve-rudolph-gelis-ca4-1994.