United States v. Steve Blaise

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 2018
Docket15-11585
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Steve Blaise (United States v. Steve Blaise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Steve Blaise, (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 18-11585 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20116-DPG-8

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEVE BLAISE,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(October 17, 2018)

Before TJOFLAT, BRANCH and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Steve Blaise pled guilty to one count of conspiring to possess cocaine with

intent to distribute and one count of aggravated identity theft. In his plea

agreement, Blaise waived the right to appeal his sentence, unless one of three Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 2 of 3

exceptions is met. None of those exceptions apply here, and the Government

moved to dismiss the appeal based on the sentence appeal waiver.

We will enforce the sentence appeal waiver so long as Blaise’s waiver was

knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51

(11th Cir. 1993). To prevail, “[t]he government must show that either (1) the

district court specifically questioned the defendant concerning the sentence appeal

waiver during the Rule 11 colloquy, or (2) it is manifestly clear from the record

that the defendant otherwise understood the full significance of the waiver.” Id. at

1351.

At the plea colloquy, the District Court confirmed that Blaise was not under

the influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication. It also confirmed Blaise does not

suffer from any mental illness. The District Court asked whether Blaise entered

into the plea agreement voluntarily and whether he had discussed it with his

attorney. Blaise answered yes to both. Finally, the District Court explicitly

discussed the sentence-appeal-waiver provision. Blaise said that he understood the

provision and knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. As such, the

Government has shown that Blaise knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to

appeal his sentence.

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal

waiver in Blaise’s plea agreement is GRANTED.

2 Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 3 of 3

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Steve Blaise, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steve-blaise-ca11-2018.