United States v. Steve Blaise
This text of United States v. Steve Blaise (United States v. Steve Blaise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 18-11585 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20116-DPG-8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVE BLAISE,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
(October 17, 2018)
Before TJOFLAT, BRANCH and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Steve Blaise pled guilty to one count of conspiring to possess cocaine with
intent to distribute and one count of aggravated identity theft. In his plea
agreement, Blaise waived the right to appeal his sentence, unless one of three Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 2 of 3
exceptions is met. None of those exceptions apply here, and the Government
moved to dismiss the appeal based on the sentence appeal waiver.
We will enforce the sentence appeal waiver so long as Blaise’s waiver was
knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51
(11th Cir. 1993). To prevail, “[t]he government must show that either (1) the
district court specifically questioned the defendant concerning the sentence appeal
waiver during the Rule 11 colloquy, or (2) it is manifestly clear from the record
that the defendant otherwise understood the full significance of the waiver.” Id. at
1351.
At the plea colloquy, the District Court confirmed that Blaise was not under
the influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication. It also confirmed Blaise does not
suffer from any mental illness. The District Court asked whether Blaise entered
into the plea agreement voluntarily and whether he had discussed it with his
attorney. Blaise answered yes to both. Finally, the District Court explicitly
discussed the sentence-appeal-waiver provision. Blaise said that he understood the
provision and knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. As such, the
Government has shown that Blaise knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to
appeal his sentence.
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Blaise’s plea agreement is GRANTED.
2 Case: 18-11585 Date Filed: 10/17/2018 Page: 3 of 3
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Steve Blaise, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steve-blaise-ca11-2018.