United States v. Stern

72 F. 44, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2532
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 1896
DocketNo. 1,972
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F. 44 (United States v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stern, 72 F. 44, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2532 (circtsdny 1896).

Opinion

COXE, District Judge

(orally). The question is whether or not the articles imported should be classified under paragraph 413 as “lacés,” or under paragraph 414 as “manufactures of silk.” 26 Stat. 598. Upon'the evidence before the board of appraisers they find that they were, not laces and were manufactures of silk. Some evidence has been taken in the circuit court, which does not, in my judgment, in any way aid the contention of the appellant. The decision of the board upon the disputed question of fact is conclusive, and their decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F. 44, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stern-circtsdny-1896.