United States v. Sterling

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sterling. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 F.4th 783
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 7, 2025·No. 24-11028·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-11028 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 24-11028 August 7, 2025 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Kristopher Sterling,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CR-139-1 ______________________________

Before Smith, Graves, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Kristopher Sterling has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sterling has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-11028 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/07/2025

No. 24-11028

We concur with counsel that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sterling, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Sterling (United States v. Sterling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)