United States v. Stephenson
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
This is another case which comes within our holding in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. Here, the law officer erred when he instructed the court-martial as follows:
“. . . you are further advised that if the absence without proper authority is much prolonged and there is no satisfactory explanation of it the court may be justified in inferring an intent to remain absent permanently.”
Accordingly, the finding of guilt of the offense of desertion must be set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
8 C.M.A. 657 (United States v. Stephenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.