United States v. Stephenson

8 C.M.A. 657, 8 USCMA 657, 25 C.M.R. 161, 1958 CMA LEXIS 715, 1958 WL 3103
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 1958
DocketNo. 10,541
StatusPublished

This text of 8 C.M.A. 657 (United States v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stephenson, 8 C.M.A. 657, 8 USCMA 657, 25 C.M.R. 161, 1958 CMA LEXIS 715, 1958 WL 3103 (cma 1958).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

HomeR Ferguson, Judge:

This is another case which comes within our holding in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. Here, the law officer erred when he instructed the court-martial as follows:

“. . . you are further advised that if the absence without proper authority is much prolonged and there is no satisfactory explanation of it the court may be justified in inferring an intent to remain absent permanently.”

Accordingly, the finding of guilt of the offense of desertion must be set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs. Judge Latimer dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 657, 8 USCMA 657, 25 C.M.R. 161, 1958 CMA LEXIS 715, 1958 WL 3103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stephenson-cma-1958.