United States v. Stephens
This text of United States v. Stephens (United States v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________
No. 201500397 _________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. TRAVONTA A. STEPHENS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant _________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Commander Marcus N. Fulton, JAGC, USN . For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Richard A. Viczorek, USMCR . For Appellee: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN; Major Tracey L. Holtshirley, USMC. _________________________
Decided 30 August 2016 _________________________
Before P ALMER , FISCHER, 1 and R UGH , Appellate Military Judges _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be cited as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.2. _________________________
PER CURIAM: A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of attempted sexual assault of a child and one specification of violating a lawful general order, in violation of Articles 80 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880 and 892. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of 26 months’ confinement, reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge.
1 Senior Judge Fischer participated in the decision of this case prior to detaching from the court. United States v. Stephens, No. 201500397
The appellant avers that the military judge erred in concluding a dishonorable discharge was a mandatory minimum punishment for his attempted sexual assault of a child conviction. In accordance with our holding in United States v. Henegar, __ M.J. __, No. 201500379, 2016 CCA LEXIS 495 (N-M. Ct. Crim. .App. 18 Aug 2016), we summarily reject this assigned error and affirm the findings and sentence.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Stephens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stephens-nmcca-2016.