United States v. Stephen Harvey Millang

423 F.2d 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1970
Docket23392
StatusPublished

This text of 423 F.2d 713 (United States v. Stephen Harvey Millang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stephen Harvey Millang, 423 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Millang was convicted for refusal to submit to induction into the armed forces, 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We ordered vacation of the submission of the case on appeal pending the in banc decision of this court in Ehlert v. United States, 422 F.2d 332, decided February 2, 1970. That opinion requires the affirmance of Millang’s conviction.

Millang’s request for a conscientious objector Form 150, was his first reference to any possible claim of conscientious objection to military service. The request came three days after he had been ordered to report for induction. The board refused to reopen his classification. Later, in a letter, Millang stated that he had made his request for 1-0 status as soon as his thoughts “became sufficiently crystallized.”

Millang’s sole claim of error is that the local board should have reopened his classification, after receipt of his induction order, because the crystallization of his views was a change in circumstances beyond his control. Ehlert v. United States, supra, rejected the same contention.

The judgment is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William Ward Ehlert v. United States
422 F.2d 332 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 F.2d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stephen-harvey-millang-ca9-1970.