United States v. Stephany Tsanges

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Stephany Tsanges

755 F.2d 483, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1985

Docket85-3007

StatusPublished

This text of 755 F.2d 483 (United States v. Stephany Tsanges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stephany Tsanges, 755 F.2d 483, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023 (6th Cir. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The appeal from a conviction on criminal charges was dismissed by the Clerk due to appellant’s failure (or that of her counsel) to file the necessary appearance form within the specified time after docketing the notice of appeal. The dismissal was in accordance with the Court’s policy, adopted after January 1, 1985, to require all parties who wish to file documents or proceed otherwise in this Court to file the prescribed appearance form, a transcript order form, an(b *n cases, a pre-argument brief statement of issues in respect to appeals within fourteen day after docketing. {See sections 3 through 7 inclusive of the interna^ operating procedures of the Court), Appellant’s attorney was notified by the Clerk of these procedures after docketing the aPPea-l and before the dismissal,

Within a few days of the order of dismissal, appellant caused a motion to reinstate, the appeal to be filed, stating that arrangements had been made to pay the costs of transcript in connection with the appeal, filing fees had been paid, and that the appeal was not taken for purposes of delay. Since the policy has been in force only a short time, and we are satisfied that the ^rest« of ^tice would be served by reinstating this appeal from a criminal conviction, appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

Appellant and all parties involved in appeals to this Court are put on notice, however, that the Court will enforce these requirements in the future,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The appeal from a conviction on criminal charges was dismissed by the Clerk due to appellant’s failure (or that of her counsel) to file the necessary appearance form within the specified time after docketing the notice of appeal. The dismissal was in accordance with the Court’s policy, adopted after January 1, 1985, to require all parties who wish to file documents or proceed otherwise in this Court to file the prescribed appearance form, a transcript order form, an(b *n cases, a pre-argument brief statement of issues in respect to appeals within fourteen day after docketing. {See sections 3 through 7 inclusive of the interna^ operating procedures of the Court), Appellant’s attorney was notified by the Clerk of these procedures after docketing the aPPea-l and before the dismissal,

Within a few days of the order of dismissal, appellant caused a motion to reinstate, the appeal to be filed, stating that arrangements had been made to pay the costs of transcript in connection with the appeal, filing fees had been paid, and that the appeal was not taken for purposes of delay. Since the policy has been in force only a short time, and we are satisfied that the ^rest« of ^tice would be served by reinstating this appeal from a criminal conviction, appellant’s motion is GRANTED.

Appellant and all parties involved in appeals to this Court are put on notice, however, that the Court will enforce these requirements in the future,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 F.2d 483, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stephany-tsanges-ca6-1985.