United States v. Stephanie Elliott

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 4, 2024
• Docket: 24-6023
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6023 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEPHANIE DIANNA ELLIOTT, a/k/a Stephanie Wilson, a/k/a Stephanie Moore, a/k/a Stephanie Russell, a/k/a Stephanie Hanchett, a/k/a Vicki Marsh, a/k/a Monica Allen, a/k/a Melissa Standford, a/k/a Jennifer Taylor, a/k/a Heidi Litchford, a/k/a Sandy Morehead, a/k/a Randy Morehead, a/k/a Katie Jones, a/k/a Sharon Mitchell, a/k/a Sara James, a/k/a Janet Harrington,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-cr-00142-D-1)

Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 4, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephanie Dianna Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Tobin Webb Lathan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6023 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Stephanie Dianna Elliott, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order

denying her postjudgment motions to unseal the grand jury transcripts and for issuance of

subpoenas under Fed. R. Crim. P. 17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny Elliott’s motion for

appointment of counsel. United States v. Elliott, No. 5:21-cr-00142-D-1 (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 20, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED