United States v. Stenerson
This text of 70 M.J. 341 (United States v. Stenerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CCA S31864.
On consideration of the motions filed by Major Andrew J. Unsicker to withdraw from representation as Appellate Defense Counsel in the above cases, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent the Appellants and that new counsel have assumed representation of said Appellants. Accordingly, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 M.J. 341, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stenerson-armfor-2011.