United States v. Steinmark

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10785 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REGGIE PAUL STEINMARK, also known as Reggie Stein,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-389-A - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reggie Paul Steinmark appeals from the district court's

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that the

district court erred by basing his sentence upon the total amount

of the loss involved in the conspiracy and that he received

ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to

raise this argument before the district court. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, the decision of the district

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-10785 -2-

court is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the

district court.

AFFIRMED.