United States v. Steen & Cwergius' Factory
This text of 27 F. Cas. 1303 (United States v. Steen & Cwergius' Factory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By section 44 of the internal revenue act of July 20, 1868, any person (described by section 59) who produces distilled spirits, or who brews cr makes mash, wort, or wash fit for distillation or for the production of spirits, or who, by any process of vaporization, separates alcoholic spirits from any fermented substance, or who makes or keeps mash, wort, or wash, and has in his possession a still, not having paid special tax, or given bond, forfeits all the personal property found in the distillery. The joint resolution of July 20, 1868, has no effect to authorize the distillation, by any person, of fermented liquor, except in an authorized distillery. And as the uncontradicted evidence showed that the claimant did have a wash and also a still, on his premises, capable of distilling, and did there distill fermented liquors, the same not being an authorized distillery, the property proceeded against became forfeited, notwithstanding the fact that the product of his establishment was not distilled spirits, but only vinegar.
There must, therefore, be judgment on the verdict
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 F. Cas. 1303, 6 Ben. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steen-cwergius-factory-nyed-1872.