United States v. Steburg
This text of United States v. Steburg (United States v. Steburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 25-cv-02092-KAW
8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONSES SHOULD NOT BE 10 ANITA L. STEBURG, ENFORCED 11 Respondent.
12 13 Good cause having been shown by Petitioner UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon its 14 petition filed in the above-entitled proceeding, it is hereby: 15 ORDERED that Respondent ANITA L. STEBURG appear before this Court on June 5, 16 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in the United States District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, and 17 then and there show cause, if any, why Respondent should not be compelled to appear and provide 18 documents and testimony as required by the summons heretofore served upon Respondent as 19 alleged and set forth in particular in said petition; and it is further: 20 ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of the aforesaid 21 petition, be served upon said Respondent in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 at 22 on or before April 10, 2025; and it is further: 23 ORDERED that on or before May 1, 2025, Respondent may file and serve a written 24 response to the petition, supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance 25 with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as well as any motion Respondent desires to make. Petitioner may file and 26 serve a written reply to such response, if any, by May 15, 2025. Notwithstanding, by May 15, 27 2025, Petitioner shall file a proposed order inclusive of all relief sought by way of the petition. 1 raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by 2 affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered. Respondent is advised that any uncontested 3 allegation in the petition will be considered admitted. See Foster v. Adam & Assocs., Inc., Case 4 || No. 18-cv-2723-JSC, 2020 WL 3639648, at *3 n.3 (N.D. Cal. July 6, 2020) (citing Booth v. 5 United States, 914 F.3d 1199, 1206 (9th Cir. 2019)) (declining to consider argument raised for the 6 first time during oral argument); Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLC, Case No. 16-cv-7244-EMC, 2020 WL 7 5517244, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2020) (arguments made for first time at hearing were waived). 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 || Dated: March 13, 2025 10 ANDIS A. WESTMORE Unitet States Magistrate Judge 12
© 15 16
= 17
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Steburg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-steburg-cand-2025.