United States v. Staton

24 F. App'x 222
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 2002
Docket01-4559
StatusUnpublished

This text of 24 F. App'x 222 (United States v. Staton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Staton, 24 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael B. Staton, Jr., appeals from his conviction on one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) (1994). Staton contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion in limine seeking to exclude the testimony of a government witness on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct. Specifically, Staton argues that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by failing to advise him of the witness’ inculpatory statements prior to filing a joint waiver of jury trial. Because we conclude that there was no prosecutorial misconduct, United States v. Mitchell, 1 F.3d 235, 240 (4th Cir.1993) (discussing standard), we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion in limine. Consequently, we affirm Sta-ton’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Paul Michael Mitchell
1 F.3d 235 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-staton-ca4-2002.