United States v. State

135 S. Ct. 563, 190 L. Ed. 2d 514, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 27, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8436
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 15, 2014
DocketNo. 5 Orig.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 135 S. Ct. 563 (United States v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. State, 135 S. Ct. 563, 190 L. Ed. 2d 514, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 27, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8436 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE

On October 27, 1947, this Court entered a final decree addressing the entitlement of the United States and the State of California to lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Pacific Ocean offshore of California. United States v. California, 332 U.S. 804, 68 S.Ct. 20, 92 L.Ed. 382 (1947)(per curiam). On January 31, 1966, this Court entered a supplemental decree redefining the federal-state boundary pursuant to the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1301-1315. 382 U.S. 448, 86 S.Ct. 607, 15 L.Ed.2d 517 (1966)(per curiam). Between 1977 and 1981, this Court issued three additional supplemental decrees further delineating particular portions of the federal-state boundary. 432 U.S. 40, 97 S.Ct. 2915, 53 L.Ed.2d 94 (1977); 439 U.S. 30, 99 S.Ct. 556, 58 L.Ed.2d 267 (1978); 449 U.S. 408, 101 S.Ct. 912, 66 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981). For the purpose of identifying with greater particularity the boundary line between the submerged lands of California and those of the United States, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:

1. As against the United States, with the exceptions provided by Section 5 of the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1313, the State of California is entitled to all lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Pacific Ocean, bounded on the south by the international boundary with the United Mexican States and on the north by the boundary between the States of California and Oregon and an extension thereof, that lie landward of the lines described in paragraph 3 below.

2. As against the State of California, the United States is entitled to all lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Pacific Ocean, bounded on the south by the international boundary with the United Mexican States and on the north by the boundary between the States of California and Oregon and an extension thereof, that lie seaward of the lines described in paragraph 3 below.

3. The federal-state boundary lines, referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, are located as follows:

EXHIBIT A

Location of the Fixed Offshore Boundary Between the United States and California that is Parallel to the Coastline of Mainland California.

*564*565*566*567*568*569*570*571*572*573*574*575*576*577*578*579*580*581*582*583*584*585*586*587*588*589*590*591*592*593*594*595*596*597*598

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beylund v. Levi
2017 ND 30 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2017)
State Of Washington, V Jarrod A. Wiebe
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016
Harvey, Zachariah
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Rose v. Johnson
141 F. Supp. 2d 661 (S.D. Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 563, 190 L. Ed. 2d 514, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 27, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-state-scotus-2014.