United States v. State of N.J., Shaw (Ralph), City of Atlantic City, City of Camden, City of East Orange, City of Elizabeth, City of Hoboken, City of Jersey City, City of Brunswick, City of Newark, City of Patterson, City of Plainfield, City of Trenton

937 F.2d 600
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1991
Docket91-5041
StatusPublished

This text of 937 F.2d 600 (United States v. State of N.J., Shaw (Ralph), City of Atlantic City, City of Camden, City of East Orange, City of Elizabeth, City of Hoboken, City of Jersey City, City of Brunswick, City of Newark, City of Patterson, City of Plainfield, City of Trenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. State of N.J., Shaw (Ralph), City of Atlantic City, City of Camden, City of East Orange, City of Elizabeth, City of Hoboken, City of Jersey City, City of Brunswick, City of Newark, City of Patterson, City of Plainfield, City of Trenton, 937 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1991).

Opinion

937 F.2d 600

U.S.
v.
State of N.J., Shaw (Ralph), City of Atlantic City, City of
Camden, City of East Orange, City of Elizabeth, City of
Hoboken, City of Jersey City, City of Brunswick, City of
Newark, City of Patterson, City of Plainfield, City of Trenton

NO. 91-5041

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 13, 1991

Appeal From: D.N.J.,

Politan, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 F.2d 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-state-of-nj-shaw-ralph-city-of-atlantic-city-city-ca3-1991.