United States v. State of Nevada

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3. |, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:25-cv-00004 A Plaintiff, 5 Vv. {PROPOSED 6 || THE STATE OF NEVADA, ORDER 7 Defendants. 8 9 ORDER 10 For good cause shown, and in consideration of the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss and 11 || Retain Jurisdiction, the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion and conditionally dismisses the 12 || above-titled action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Court specifically 13 || retains jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement (filed with the Court as Attachment A to the Joint 14 || Motion to Dismiss and Retain Jurisdiction), in accordance with its terms, which are incorporated 15 || herein by reference, and for its duration. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 16 || U.S. 375, 381 (1994) (recognizing that a federal district court may retain jurisdiction to enforce a 17 || “dismissal-producing settlement agreement” in its order); Alvarado v. Table Mountain 18 || Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1017 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[A] federal court has jurisdiction to enforce a 19 |! settlement agreement in a dismissed case when the dismissal order incorporates the settlement 20 || terms, or the court has retained jurisdiction over the settlement contract.”). 21 || SOORDERED this 5th day of February , 2025. 22 Yr ws jlosed Ter 23 United States District Judge 24 -