United States v. State of Mississippi

211 F. App'x 296
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2006
Docket05-61184
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 F. App'x 296 (United States v. State of Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. State of Mississippi, 211 F. App'x 296 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

On appeal, Defendant-Appellant Simpson County School District (“the District”) asks this court to reverse the district court’s ruling that denied the District’s efforts to be declared unitary and the continuing court-supervised desegregation case against it dismissed. The district-court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order appealed from granted the District’s motion in part, declaring unitary status in the areas of student body compositions, transportation, extracurricular activities, and facilities. It denied unitary status, however, and thereby retained oversight, regarding faculty and staff assignments. The court thus retained jurisdiction under the consent decree and reserved the option to reevaluate the District’s position in one year.

Based on our extensive review of the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs, we perceive no reversible error of fact or law, and therefore affirm the ruling of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Fletcher Ex Rel. Fletcher
805 F.3d 596 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-state-of-mississippi-ca5-2006.