Home/Supreme Court/United States v. State of Louisiana

United States v. State of Louisiana

403 U.S. 950, 91 S. Ct. 2271, 29 L. Ed. 2d 861, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 1485
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 28, 1971
Docket9, Original
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 403 U.S. 950 (United States v. State of Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. State of Louisiana, 403 U.S. 950, 91 S. Ct. 2271, 29 L. Ed. 2d 861, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 1485 (1971).

Opinion

Joint motion of the

United’ States and the State of Florida to initiate supplemental proceedings granted. Motions of the United States and the State of Florida to consolidate proceedings [see No. 35, Origij-swpraj and to appoint Special Master granted. .

It Is Ordered that the Honorable Albert B. Maris, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master to conduct supplemental proceedings which shall be docketed as case No. 52, Orig. The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions for filing additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas,-and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to subihit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. Allowances to him, compensation paid to his technical, stenographic., and clerical assistants, cost of printing his reports, and.all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

It Is Further Ordered' that if the positioii of Special Master becomes vacant during recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to .make a new designation which shall have the, same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.

[For earlier orders herein, she, e. g., 395 U. S. 901.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hunter
261 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
State ex rel. Coco
363 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)
State v. Lester
240 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Thomas
240 S.E.2d 426 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
Carter v. State
361 N.E.2d 145 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1977)
Adam A. MacK Jr., and Shelton J. Williams v. Ross Maggio, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
538 F.2d 1129 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
State v. McKenna
224 S.E.2d 537 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Cousins
223 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
State v. Young
214 S.E.2d 763 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Peters
302 So. 2d 888 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
State v. Waddell
194 S.E.2d 19 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Anderson
188 S.E.2d 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Funicello
286 A.2d 55 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)
State v. Chance
185 S.E.2d 227 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Shaffer
257 So. 2d 121 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
State v. Anderson
255 So. 2d 348 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)
State v. Doss
183 S.E.2d 671 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Atkinson
183 S.E.2d 105 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 U.S. 950, 91 S. Ct. 2271, 29 L. Ed. 2d 861, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-state-of-louisiana-scotus-1971.