United States v. Starks

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Starks

309 F. App'x 322

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 29, 2009·No. No. 08-11975·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Kendell Lee Starks in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Kendell Lee Starks in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Starks, 309 F. App'x 322 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

309 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Starks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related