United States v. Stanton

16 C.M.A. 526, 16 USCMA 526
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 1967
DocketNo. 19,898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 C.M.A. 526 (United States v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stanton, 16 C.M.A. 526, 16 USCMA 526 (cma 1967).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

Appellant was arraigned before a special court-martial convened at the U. S. Naval Station, Brooklyn, New York, charged with absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. He pleaded guilty and was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and a loss of two-thirds pay for three months. The convening authority thereafter approved only so much of the sentence as provided for bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $60.00 per month for three months. The officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction approved this action. A board of review in the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy affirmed the finding of.guilty and the sentence.

The president of this special court-martial neither instructed the court members as to the maximum imposable punishment, nor did he advise them that the bad-conduct discharge was imposable only because of two previous convictions. This was error.

In short, the defects found in this record are substantially identical to those found in United States v Turner, 9 USCMA 124, 25 CMR 386, and United States v Ferree, 16 USCMA 506, 37 CMR 126. Our opinions in those cases are controlling.

Accordingly, the petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is reversed and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for further action. A rehearing may be ordered on the penalty.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Ferguson concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thomas
17 C.M.A. 22 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 C.M.A. 526, 16 USCMA 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stanton-cma-1967.