United States v. Stanton

Second Circuit

United States v. Stanton

87 F. 698, 31 C.C.A. 197, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2024

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1898

DocketNo. 9

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 F. 698 (United States v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Stanton, 87 F. 698, 31 C.C.A. 197, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2024 (2d Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the court below that it is the meaning of section 835 of the Revised Statutes of the United States that the United States attorney is entitled to all of the fees and enioluments of his office, when, in addition to the amount of his necessary expenses, they do not exceed the sum of $6,000 per annum. As it now appears that the defendant in error had not received the amount of the items in controversy from the emoluments of his office, the judgment should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the court below that it is the meaning of section 835 of the Revised Statutes of the United States that the United States attorney is entitled to all of the fees and enioluments of his office, when, in addition to the amount of his necessary expenses, they do not exceed the sum of $6,000 per annum. As it now appears that the defendant in error had not received the amount of the items in controversy from the emoluments of his office, the judgment should be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 F. 698, 31 C.C.A. 197, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stanton-ca2-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack