United States v. Stanley S. Hecht
This text of 248 F.2d 544 (United States v. Stanley S. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
248 F.2d 544
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley S. HECHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 113.
Docket 24724.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued October 8, 1957.
Decided October 23, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edmund L. Palmieri, Judge.
Stanley S. Hecht appeals from a conviction of contempt of court for failing to produce before a Grand Jury, in response to subpoena, certain books and records of a corporation of which he was the president and director.
William Merritt, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
William K. Zinke, Asst. U. S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., and Arthur B. Kramer, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed. United States v. Johnson, 2 Cir., 247 F.2d 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 F.2d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stanley-s-hecht-ca2-1957.