United States v. Stanley Huberman
356 F.2d 515, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004
This text of 356 F.2d 515 (United States v. Stanley Huberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Stanley Huberman, 356 F.2d 515, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004 (3d Cir. 1966).
Opinion
We think that appellant’s filing of his notice of appeal was timely under the facts before us. O’Neal v. United States, 272 F.2d 412 (5 Cir. 1943).
Regarding the merits, we find that there is no error of substance in the trial record.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Print Carter O'Neal v. United States
272 F.2d 412 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
356 F.2d 515, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stanley-huberman-ca3-1966.