United States v. Stanley Huberman

356 F.2d 515, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 2, 1966·No. 15570_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that appellant’s filing of his notice of appeal was timely under the facts before us. O’Neal v. United States, 272 F.2d 412 (5 Cir. 1943).

Regarding the merits, we find that there is no error of substance in the trial record.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stanley Huberman, 356 F.2d 515, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7004 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

356 F.2d 515 (United States v. Stanley Huberman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.