United States v. Stanley

425 F. App'x 200
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2011·No. No. 10-7600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Darion Stanley seeks to appeal the extent of the district court’s reduction of his sentence pursuant to the Government’s Rule 35(b) motion. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006) this court does not have “jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court’s downward departure.” United, States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir.1995). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stanley, 425 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2011).

425 F. App'x 200 (United States v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stephan Gary Hill
70 F.3d 321 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)