United States v. Staffeldt
This text of United States v. Staffeldt (United States v. Staffeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-10243 v. D.C. No. JEREMY EUGENE STAFFELDT; CR-03-01294-ROS District of Arizona, ORLANDO LEON PASTRANO; LINCOLN CLARENCE METZGAR; JOHN Phoenix ANTHONY GONZALES, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. Filed April 22, 2008
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, John T. Noonan, and Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The Government’s unopposed motion to amend the opinion is GRANTED. The opinion published at 451 F.3d 578 (9th Cir. 2006) is amended to delete all mentions of the name “Keith Vercauteren.” Accordingly, the phrase “In September 2003, Assistant United States Attorney Keith Vercauteren (“AUSA Vercauteren”) . . . ” shall be amended to read, “In September 2003, an Assistant United States Attorney (“the AUSA”) . . . ” All subsequent references to “AUSA Ver- cauteren” shall be amended to read, “the AUSA.”
4215 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Staffeldt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-staffeldt-ca9-2008.