United States v. Stadel
71 M.J. 160, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 21, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0149/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 160 (United States v. Stadel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Stadel, 71 M.J. 160, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 199 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 20090820. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE MILITARY JUDGE’S FAILURE TO INSTRUCT THE PANEL THAT IT COULD CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF CONSENT IN DECIDING WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT PROVED THAT THE ACT WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY FORCE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 160, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stadel-armfor-2012.