United States v. Stacker

556 F. App'x 555
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2989
StatusPublished

This text of 556 F. App'x 555 (United States v. Stacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Stacker, 556 F. App'x 555 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Ann Stacker pleaded guilty to a fraud offense, and was sentenced by the district court1 to 4 years of probation. On appeal, counsel for Stacker seeks to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the court [556]*556abused its discretion by failing to convert Stacker’s felony conviction into a misdemeanor. We reject this argument as legally unfounded. Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to his informing Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 F. App'x 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stacker-ca8-2014.