United States v. Stacker
This text of 556 F. App'x 555 (United States v. Stacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brenda Ann Stacker pleaded guilty to a fraud offense, and was sentenced by the district court1 to 4 years of probation. On appeal, counsel for Stacker seeks to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the court [556]*556abused its discretion by failing to convert Stacker’s felony conviction into a misdemeanor. We reject this argument as legally unfounded. Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to his informing Stacker about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 F. App'x 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-stacker-ca8-2014.