United States v. Staab

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 1995
Docket95-10821
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Staab (United States v. Staab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Staab, (5th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10821 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC JOSEPH STAAB,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:95-CR-48-A)

November 28, 1995 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Joseph Staab appeals his sentence on conviction of wire

fraud. He contends solely that the district court erred by

adjusting his offense level upward for his role as a manager or

supervisor. We have reviewed the record and hold that the district

court’s finding that Staab was a manager or supervisor is not

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 358 (1993).

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Edgar Rolando Palomo
998 F.2d 253 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Staab, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-staab-ca5-1995.