United States v. Staab
This text of United States v. Staab (United States v. Staab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-10821 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC JOSEPH STAAB,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:95-CR-48-A)
November 28, 1995 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eric Joseph Staab appeals his sentence on conviction of wire
fraud. He contends solely that the district court erred by
adjusting his offense level upward for his role as a manager or
supervisor. We have reviewed the record and hold that the district
court’s finding that Staab was a manager or supervisor is not
clearly erroneous. See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257
(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 358 (1993).
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Staab, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-staab-ca5-1995.