United States v. Spruill
This text of United States v. Spruill (United States v. Spruill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7459
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM SPRUILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-99-117-RAJ)
Submitted: March 8, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Spruill, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Spruill appeals the district court’s order
denying Spruill’s motion for appointment of counsel. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Spruill, No. CR-99-117-RAJ (E.D. Va. July 13, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Spruill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spruill-ca4-2006.