United States v. Spruill

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 1997·No. 97-6260·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6260

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEON G. SPRUILL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-151, CA-96-827-2)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon G. Spruill, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), his motions for reconsideration of that order, and his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly , we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap-

peal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spruill, Nos. CR-94-151; CA-96-827-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4,

1996; Dec. 17, 1996; Jan. 13, 1997; and Jan. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Spruill, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Spruill (United States v. Spruill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related