United States v. Spotts
73 M.J. 201, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 67
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 16, 2014
DocketNo. 14-0230/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 73 M.J. 201 (United States v. Spotts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Spotts, 73 M.J. 201, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 67 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA 20111144. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN HIS TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO REQUEST DEFERMENT OF AUTOMATIC FORFEITURES ON HIS BEHALF.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 201, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spotts-armfor-2014.