United States v. Spoone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7480

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY FORRESTER SPOONE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-3378-6-13BG)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 19, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to alter or amend a presentence

investigation report and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Spoone, No. CA-00-3378-6-13BG (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2002; Oct.

18, 2002). We deny Spoone’s motion to consolidate this appeal with

case number 02-7827. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED