United States v. Spintz
This text of 18 F. 377 (United States v. Spintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant demurred to the indictment for misjoinder. The court overruled the demurrer, as stated in head-note 1. See U. S. v. Wentworth, 11 Fed. Rep. 52; U. S. v. Malone, 9 Fed. Rep. 900; U. S. v. Stone, 8 Fed. Rep. 252; U. S. v. Ancarola, 1 Fed. Rep. 677.
Defendant pleaded misnomer; that he was indicted as Joseph Spintz, and that his true name is Joseph Sprinz; and that he was known only by his true name. The district attorney demurred to the plea, hut the demurrer was overruled, as stated in head-note 2. See Arelib. Grim. PI. & Pr. 82; Lynes v. State, 30 Amer. Dec. 557; 39 Amer. Dec. 457; 28 Amer. Rep. 439, note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spintz-circtsdga-1883.