United States v. Spinner

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Spinner

22 F. App'x 6

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 29, 2001

DocketNo. 00-3096

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 F. App'x 6 (United States v. Spinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Spinner, 22 F. App'x 6 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 14, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 14, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 F. App'x 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spinner-cadc-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack