United States v. Spies

Second Circuit

United States v. Spies

128 F.2d 743, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 710, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3700

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 19, 1942·No. No. 280·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question upon this appeal of enough importance to demand notice is the judge’s charge, which followed the interpretation put upon § 145(b), 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code, in O’Brien v. United States, 7 Cir., 51 F.2d 193, which we followed in United States v. Miro, 60 F.2d 58. We all agree that we must continue so to construe the section until the Supreme Court decides otherwise; but Judge L. HAND wishes it to appear that as a new matter he would decide otherwise, and would reverse this conviction in accordance with the reasoning of Judge Alschuler’s dissent in O’Brien v. United States, supra, which appears to him unanswerable.

Conviction affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only question upon this appeal of enough importance to demand notice is the judge’s charge, which followed the interpretation put upon § 145(b), 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code, in O’Brien v. United States, 7 Cir., 51 F.2d 193, which we followed in United States v. Miro, 60 F.2d 58. We all agree that we must continue so to construe the section until the Supreme Court decides otherwise; but Judge L. HAND wishes it to appear that as a new matter he would decide otherwise, and would reverse this conviction in accordance with the reasoning of Judge Alschuler’s dissent in O’Brien v. United States, supra, which appears to him unanswerable.

Conviction affirmed.

United States v. Spies, 128 F.2d 743, 29 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 710, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3700 (2d Cir. 1942).

Pincite

128 F.2d 743 (United States v. Spies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related