United States v. Spiel

8 F. 143, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 107, 1881 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128
CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedAugust 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 F. 143 (United States v. Spiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Spiel, 8 F. 143, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 107, 1881 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128 (mnd 1881).

Opinion

Nelson, D. J.

This suit is brought upon a judgment obtained against David Rohrer, administrator of the estate of Henry Tilden, deceased, J. C. Ramsey, Benjamin F. Hoyt, Louis Roberts, James McBoal, D. F. Brawley, David L. Fuller, and B. W. Brunson, January 5, 1857. The administrator of J. C. Ramsey alone is now sued, and a demurrer is interposed by him to the complaint. The questions in the case raised on the demurrer are whether the action can be maintained against the representative of the deceased debtor alone; and, further, is the action barred by the statutes of Minnesota limiting the time when actions upon judgments can be brought to 10 years? The judgment was rendered against all the parties above named, and in the complaint appears to be a joint one. In pay opinion (1) the statute of limitations of the state of Minnesota does not run against the United States whether the claim rests in judgment or not; (2) by the common law, on the death of Ramsey the suit upon the judgment could be brought only against the survivors..

By the statutes of Minnesota (see chapter 77, § 1, and chapter 53, § 19, Gen. St. Minn.) the estate of Ramsey is liable; and, although the judgment is joint, the liability is the same as if the judgment had been against him alone. Again, the judgment against the administrator of Ramsey would be de bonis testatoris, while against the surviving joint debtors it should be de bonis propriis. It would seem to follow, then, that the action must be brought against the administrator of Ramsey separately, and he cannot be joined with the surviving obligors. It is unnecessary, however, to go to this extent to sustain the complaint in this action, for the liability of the estate is fixed by the statute.

Demurrer overruled, with leave to answer in 20 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berryhill v. Peabody
75 N.W. 220 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. 143, 3 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 107, 1881 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spiel-mnd-1881.