United States v. Spencer
This text of 27 F. Cas. 1281 (United States v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Declaration, on a receivers’ bond, against the principal and his sureties. Breach assigned: That Spencer was appointed receiver of public moneys, for the term of four years, commencing on the 1st of January, 1835, and ending the 31st of December, 1839; and that divers large sums of money, arising from the sale of lands, came into, and were in, his possession, during his continuance in office—to wit: on the first day of January, 1840—which he failed and refused to pay, &c. General demurrer, by the sureties. The breach is insufficient, as respects the sureties. They are bound for the payment of all sums of money that come into the receiver’s hands during his term of office, and no longer; and, as his office expired on the 31st of December, 1839, they are not bound for moneys that came into his hands on the 1st day of January, 1840, the day after his term of office expired. If the day alledged is material, and I am inclined to think it is, it can not be rejected as surplus-age, and, therefore, the declaration is insufficient.
Plaintiff had leave to amend, and the cause was continued. [See Case No. 16,368.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 F. Cas. 1281, 2 McLean 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-spencer-circtdin-1840.