United States v. Spencer

22 F. App'x 867
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2001·No. No. 01-10309; D.C. No. CR-00-973-PHX-EHC·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Gene Spencer appeals the twelve-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U .S.C. § 3742, and we vacate the sentence.

Spencer contends that the government breached the plea agreement by failing to recommend the low end of the applicable guideline range.1 The government concedes the breach.

We agree that Spencer adequately preserved the objection in the district court. See United States v. Myers, 32 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). We therefore vacate and remand for resentencing before a different sentencing judge. See United States v. Mondragon, 228 F.3d 978, 981 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring transfer for re-sentencing after government breach); Myers, 32 F.3d at 413.

We further order that Spencer be released from custody forthwith pending re-sentencing. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Spencer, 22 F. App'x 867 (9th Cir. 2001).

22 F. App'x 867 (United States v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thomas Lee Myers
32 F.3d 411 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Ray Lawrence Mondragon
228 F.3d 978 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)